Writing Right

The KNOW: The Magazine for Paralegals LinkedIn discussion forum includes a post by Kathy DiLorenzo,  Vice President, Business Development at MyLegal.com, entitled “Why it’s Important to Write Right in the Legal Profession” with a link to an article ”Why it’s Important to Write Right in the Legal Profession – And 5 Common Writing Pitfalls to Avoid” by Brenda Bernstein.

Several posts here discuss how important it is for a professional paralegal to write correctly – using proper grammar, punctuation, capitalization, and the like. There is an category cataloguing the “Consequences of Sloppiness.” However, I do not give instruction on how to write correctly in this blog. Instead I have counted on Grammar Girl’s Quick and Dirty Tips Check out both the website and the podcasts. Both have been quite helpful to those of my students who spend even a small amount of time with either of them.

This is my first experience with Barbara’s advice, but in this article she does address some of the most common problems I experience when reading student work and legal documents produced be some very good law offices:

Past or Present – use of the wrong verb tense
Example or Complete List – use of “i.e.” and “e.g.”
Law or Liberty – confusing statute with statue
Proper Punctuation: Periods and Commas Inside Quotation Marks
Proper Punctuation: Apostrophes

Barbara presents this addition to the Consequences of Sloppiness:

In a famous case in England, a traffic ticket was thrown out because it was issued for illegal “stoping” instead of “stopping”; the alleged perpetrator had conducted no mining activities (“stoping” is a mining term) and so was found not guilty. I bet that police officer never issued another “stoping” ticket.

Barbara also offers to help:

There are multiple ways to make writing errors in legal documents, and I have only covered a few. My most important advice is to proofread and proofread again! Get a second pair of eyes to check your work. If you have grammar questions you want answered, I will answer them to the best of my ability in the comments section of this blog. I look forward to hearing from you…

I suggest we all take her up on her offer. I know I will.

  • Share/Bookmark

Not a Dead Horse

The Paralegal Todaydiscussion forum has an thread started by a post entitled, “Not to beat a dead horse, but….” Here’s the gist of the post that started it:

Sad to say I had a conversation with one of the lawyers I work for and he said “don’t get caught up in titles, you are no different than the administrative assistants”. What do you think I should do? …

Now, please do not get me wrong, I think admins are marvelous  but I have a 4 year Bachelors, an Associates and a certificate as a paralegal. …

I am so discouraged. I was hired as a paralegal (I specifically mentioned how important that was to me) I do excellent work and don’t understand why there is still this attitude. I have worked so hard for respect and to create a niche where I add value.

Normally, I’d go into a long comment on this topic, since it is really what The Empowered Paralegal is all about, but on this one I’ll let some of the comments on the thread do the talking:

Obviously the attorney needs to be educated and is ignorant of the fact of what you REALLY do and what the profession REALLY does.
 IMHO, it’s up to you to educate him (depending on if he’s actually educatiable or is too set in his archaic mindset).  That or find another firm/attorney with a bit more modern mindset that gives you the respect you deserve.
 Course that’s MHO.  People like this are working on a mindset of 20 years ago.  Prehaps it’s time he came into the 21st Century.
_______________
 I understand his comment about not getting caught up in titles, but having a sit down discussion with him about his comment and letting him know you don’t mind helping him with a letter now and then, but that your work as a paralegal has deadlines that take priority and a secretary is more likely to be able to get the correspondence work out for him.  Don’t get discouraged, this is where you stand and fight for your turf.  Draw the line (but do it succinctly and professionally) letting him know you are the consummate professional and you have his clients’ best interest at heart.
_________
not to beat a dead horse… but why do you think there are paralegal utilization studies and the constant fight to get paralegals certified and blogs about The Empowered Paralegal?
 
Yes, we have to be team players and I do my share of copying (etc.) to manage the work flow for the day, but paralegals must continue to do the job of distinguishing themselves from the great assistants out there who have, by definition, a different job than we do.  They are good at what they do, assist the attorneys and other timekeepers.  We are good at what we do, provide substantive legal services that would otherwise have been provided by an attorney, under the supervision of an attorney.
 
I volunteer and am a board member of my paralegal association and obtained the PACE certificate for these very reasons.  To continue what I feel is a very strong need to further this profession – my profession - one paralegal at a time.  I want to continue to distinguish paralegals from secretarial assistants.
____________
In all fairness, I do believe that a lot of it comes down to the size of the firm, the area, and the age of the attorneys that you’re working with.  If you go with a sole practionier, you’re going to have to be a jack of all trades, including clerical/it/legal.  I can very vividly remember even here in Va. where 20-25 years ago, attitudes were the same as what Alison has stated.  Then a curious thing happened.  As the paralegal profession started to grow, and the more trained and educated paralegals that entered the profession, attitudes slowly changed.  The younger attorneys “grew up” with professional paralegals and they slowly replaced the dinosaurs with the attitudes Alison talked about.  There was also a difference between the eastern and western parts of the state and the way we were viewed.  The eastern part of Virginia had a more progressive attitude.  The western part was, shall we say, more conservative and old fashioned.  However, that’s changed too.  But again, it’s all in the size and progressiveness of the firm.
  • Share/Bookmark

NFPA Scholarship Essay – Important Pro bono subject

NFPA has announce its annual scholarship essay contest. I’m including the notice here in full partly to spread the word, but mostly because I think the topic of the essay is of significance to the paralegal profession:

NFPA offers two scholarship annually, sponsored by Thomson-Reuters, in the amounts of $3,000 and $2,000. The scholarships are available to students currently enrolled in a paralegal program.

The subject of this year’s essay is:

Pro bono providers, such as lawyers/bar associations in many states do not include paralegals and/or paralegal students in pro bono projects. Although these providers do solicit lawyers to participate, the request does not include non-lawyers. How would you encourage pro bono providers to utilize paralegals and paralegal students to assist in providing pro bono services to those in need?

Further information on the scholarship program is available at www.paralegals.org.

Applicants are not required to be members of NFPA or its member organization, although we encourage membership for all paralegals and those interested in our profession.
Posted By Theresa Prater

It should be noted that there are examples of paralegals and paralegal students assisting in pro bono service projects. In a recent post I discussed paralegal students participating in a guardianship project supervised by attorneys from the local bar association. Another post concerned the Safe Horizon Domestic Violence Law Project in New York. When I have time to search I’m sure there are several others.

  • Share/Bookmark

Civility Forum Gives Insight into Profession

A few weeks ago I did a post on civility in the legal profession forums being held in Canada based on my wandering around the Paralegal Society of Ontario’s website and my attention being  caught by a link for the “Civility Forum Tour.”  This was of interest to a great degree because of my recent post regarding civility on paralegal discussion forums. The newest issues of The Paralegal Mentor’s newsletter references a story in the Lawyers Weekly – Candada reporting on one such forum. The article is worth the read for its discussion of civility, but also for another quote by Richard Lammers, V.P. Paralegal Society of Ontario who I quoted in the original post:

‘I got a great insight into how the profession treats one another,’ said Richard Lammers, vice president of the Paralegal Society of Ontario, who attended the meeting in Windsor, Ont. last December.

‘Before paralegals were members of the society, we didn’t have much contact or insight into what was going on in the profession,’ Lammers added.

This emphasizes a point made in a post regarding Lynne DeVenny at Practical Paralegalism noting that the Tulsa County Bar Association now allows paralegals who meet the Oklahoma Bar Association’s Minimum Qualification Standards for Legal Assistant/Paralegal to become associate members of the association. As I said there, “ The bar as all to often neglected to recognize not only the importance of paralegals, but the fact that paralegals are, like the lawyers themselves, part of the legal profession. Opening the bar association to paralegals allows the attorneys and paralegals who must work together as a legal team in the law office to associate together as the professionals they are.” Mr. Lammer’s comment  suggests that such association may very well lead to insight on the part of both paralegals and attorneys regarding the other half of the legal profession.

  • Share/Bookmark

Afghan National Army Paralegal Graduation

The NATO Training Mission in Afghanistan reports on the graduation of the first ever paralegal class from the temporary legal training school. Introducing the paralegal concept to Afghanistan is a wonderful development. I am a bit concerned though about what is considered parlegal training – two weeks of training, 27 hours of which is in literacy. However, it all has to viewed in context, I suppose.

One aspect of the story I particularly liked was this:

The students were excited by their training and eager to learn more. On the last day of class, one student asked what he could do to ensure his supervisors knew about the training he had received. The instructor responded by saying, “show them what you can do.”

As an educator I’m always pleased when the result of education is that the students are eager to learn more. But more important is the instructor’s direction to this student, which is the same as I give to paralegals seeking more responsibility and respect from their attorneys: Show them what you can do.  As discussed here several times, attorneys often suffer from misunderstanding regarding the role of their own paralegals and what their paralegals can do.

  • Share/Bookmark

Paralegal named “Woman of the Year”

One of the best ways for the legal profession to change it’s image is through public recognition of its members who do good and do it well. CapitalCityWeekly reports on a paralegal who received much deserved recognition:

Sitkan honored for work on domestic violence

Capital City Weekly

SITKA – Elisabeth Schafer, paralegal in the Sitka District Attorney’s Office, has been chosen as “Woman of the Year” by the board of Sitkans Against Family Violence. The award recognizes dedication and service to women and children in the community.

“My work with victims of domestic violence is the most satisfying part of my job,” said Schafer, who has worked as a paralegal in Sitka since 2002. “I know that sometimes I am the first person to whom a victim can safely express herself after years of emotional and physical abuse. It’s gratifying to see former victims in the community looking healthy, happy and safe.”

In addition to her paralegal work, Schafer is a member of Sitka’s Domestic Violence Task Force. She has three adult children and two grandchildren. The “Woman of the Year” award will be presented at a dinner on April 17 in Sitka.

Congratulations, Elizabeth! Your work and your professionalism help not only the victims of domestic violence, but the paralegal profession.

  • Share/Bookmark

Ad: Professionalism is a must

Our local paper (yes print media still exists) carries this ad:

Law firm seeks paralegal that can handle additional secretary and receptionist duties. Ideal candidate will have ability to organziae, prioritize and complete tasks under time constraints. Must be multi-tasked oriented and able to work in a fact paced envrionment. Excellent writing, verbal and communication skills. Professionalism is a must.

Of course, this ad interests me because it confirms my contentions that (1) those paralegal who demonstrate professionalism with control the market, and (2) professionalism is more than a set of skills. Thus, the empowered paralegal is one who is effective, efficient and professional.

This leads to the real challenge – determining just what professionalism is. In some ways it is like art and pornography – you can’t define it, but you know it when you see it. In this blog and in my book I attempt to shed some light on its primary ingredients.  It is, quite clearly, more than simply a manner of dress. I frequently point out to students that the very phrase “I dressed like a professional” implies that there is something more to professionalism than a good suit, clean hands, and a haircut. If one can “dress like a professional” and still not be professional, then dress alone does not make a professional.

As discussed in The Empowered Paralegal and throughout this blog, the ingredients of professionalism include reliability, trustworthiness, work ethic, honesty, attitude, self-reflection, standards, personal integrity, the ability to think ahead, and inter-personal skills especially in dealing with clients and attorneys.

Initial results of the Professionalism Anthology are encouraging and I hope that publication will ultimately lead to a better understanding of professionalism in the paralegal profession. In the meantime I will contact the firm that place this ad to see what it means by “Professionalism is a must.”

  • Share/Bookmark

Ghana paralegal association providing access to justice

At least I think Kwabre is in Ghana. This is an interesting report on a new paralegal association in Kwabre. I have not come close to finishing my studies of the paralegal profession in England, France, and Ontario, so I won’t be able to follow up on this soon, but it appears that”paralegal” and “paralegal association” in Ghana mean something different than they do here, or at least there are differences in their functions. If anyone knows more, I’d appreciate hearing from you. However, it does appear that, in one way or another, paralegals are integral to providing access to justice in every country where they practice:

Mamponteng (Ash), March 1, GNA – A 26-member paralegal association has been inaugurated at Mamponteng in the Kwabre District, with a call on the members to promote and safeguard the rights and freedoms of women and children.

Ms Eudora Oppong, Ashanti Regional Administrator of the International Federation of Women Lawyers (FIDA), who made the call, said women and children were the most vulnerable in society and needed to be protected.

“They are often cut off from decision-making as a result of discriminatory practices in customary law, marriage, divorce and inheritance,” she said. Miss Oppong blamed this on inadequate regional and district law courts, the slow process of adjudication of cases in the courts and the low socio-economic status of women, which tend to limit their ability to afford legal services.

FIDA has drawn up elaborate programmes including the provision of legal services to women and children, and the formation of paralegal associations in the local communities to address the problem. Ms Oppong said the Association had succeeded in securing the rights of many women and children through mediation and arbitration

  • Share/Bookmark

Paralegal Students Man Guardianship Help Desk

The Lake County News-Sun reports on a “Guardianship Help Desk” set up by the Lake County Bar Association:

“It’s to help assist these people going through the process and making the court process more efficient,” Rochford said.

Staffed by volunteer bar association attorneys and paralegal student volunteers from the College of Lake County, assistance is provided for people petitioning the court for guardianship of a minor child. The free service is for people establishing a legal relationship with a child not their own to make decisions about the child’s education, health and welfare, Rochford said.

Many people were involved in making the project work.

Circuit Judge Diane Winter, who presides over Probate Court, said many people coming into her courtroom often had incomplete or incorrectly completed paperwork, forcing the judge to assist with the paperwork.

“This was all very time-consuming for me to get these cases into court. I was only able to hear a few cases in a few hours. Now we can serve more litigates,” Winter said.

She said the help desk makes the system more efficient. Rochford said many people were frustrated with the system and previously had to come to court multiple times due to paperwork issues.

The help desk was in planning for about a year and involved cooperation by many, including county clerks and administrators, the bar association, the sheriff’s office and College of Lake County students, Winter and Rochford said.

But, of course, I am focusing on the paralegal students. I generally promote and encourage this kind of volunteering anyway, but this one is of particular interest because it demonstrates how access to justice can be improved through wise utilization of paralegals. Since each attorney can supervise several well-trained paralegal, more people gain access.

Paralegal assistants from the college received special training last fall so they work on the help desk, said Gayle Miller, CLC’s department chair of paralegal studies.

Nearly 30 students signed up, and about 20 attorneys have registered to supervise, Miller said. Because paralegals are not qualified to offer legal advice, Miller said there is always a supervising attorney at the help desk.

This project also provides a networking opportunity and experience for the students, as well as good exposure to the public. Those helped by the project, at least, will have a better understanding of the role of a paralegal as part of the legal profession.

  • Share/Bookmark

Lack of supervision of paralegal is problem for attorney

Several posts here have discussed the duty an attorney owes ethically to supervise paralegals working with that attorney. In one post, I argued it is a duty owed not only to the public, but to the paralegal. Today’s Boston Globe reports that failure to supervise a paralegal has jeopardized the license a prominent Boston attorney:

Stephen B. Hrones, the well-known 68-year-old Boston criminal defense lawyer, is heading to the state’s highest court to fight to keep his law license, accused of letting a paralegal in his office pass himself off as a lawyer in the firm’s employment discrimination practice.

The state Board of Bar Overseers recommended in October that Hrones’s license be suspended for a year and a day for the alleged misconduct. The Supreme Judicial Court plans to hear appeals in May from Hrones, who says he deserves no suspension, and from the state’s bar counsel, which had recommended a two-year suspension.

Hrones denies much, but admits he did not provide adequate supervision:

Hrones – a bearded, Harvard-educated former Fulbright scholar who dubbed himself Mr. Innocence for getting the murder or rape convictions of four prisoners tossed, based on newly discovered evidence – denied Thursday that he had authorized former employee Lionel Porter to practice law. Hrones said the firm’s letterhead identified Porter as a paralegal but that Porter began doing things behind Hrones’s back, mishandling cases and clients’ fees.

“I was too trusting of this individual, and now I’m paying the price,’’ Hrones said in an interview. “I was done in by this guy, and I should have supervised him better. . . . But I didn’t hold him out as a lawyer.’’

Porter worked for Hrones from 2001 to 2004, handling employment discrimination cases before the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination and the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission even though he was, as Hrones knew, a law school graduate who had not been admitted to the bar.

Porter bungled a series of cases; got Hrones’s firm barred from appearing before MCAD, which short-circuited active cases; and kept clients’ fees for himself, according to the board’s Oct. 19 recommendation of suspension.

Although the work of paralegals can resemble that of lawyers, the board concluded that Porter went far beyond permitted tasks. Porter single-handedly managed the firm’s employment discrimination practice and drafted and filed complaints at his own initiative in Hrones’s name in federal and state courts, the board said. Hrones fired him in the fall of 2004 after learning that Porter had kept fees in violation of an agreement to split them.

I suspect we will see more cases like these as the system adjusts to the blurring of the line between the paralegal and lawyer roles that occurs when out-of-work lawyers take on the role of a paralegal. While even licensed attorneys can cause problems for a firm is not adequately supervised, the role of the paralegal in a legal team is distinctly different from the role of an attorney. Blurring that distinction will inevitably cause problems for the attorney, especially if, as is often the case, the attorney does not really understand the role of a paralegal.

But let me get this straight, the “paralegal” here “bungled a series of cases; got Hrones’s firm barred from appearing before MCAD, which short-circuited active cases,” but was fired only when the attorney learned the paralegal “kept fees in violation of an agreement to split them.”   Does Massachusetts not have an ethical role against the splitting of fees with non-lawyers? If so, it’s tough to make a case that the only thing the attorney did wrong here was failure to supervise.

  • Share/Bookmark