The Case of the Credulous Paralegal

ABA Journal.com posts on a case I’ve been following in the Washington Post:

A credulous paralegal is facing a potential two-and-a-half-year federal prison term after apparently being duped by a convicted child molester into participating in a bizarre alleged scheme to “coerce or fool” the victim into recanting via a faked defamation suit that briefly resulted in a $3 million judgment.

Read the full ABA Journal.com post here and the Washington Post story here.

Not a lot of comment or commentary on this one. Certainly the professional paralegal manages their clients without becoming involved with them whether that involvement is romantic as discussed in a previous post or entanglement in their life circumstances. The paralegal must remain objective.

There has been a great deal of talk about “empathy” in our judicial system recently. As a paralegal you can, and should, empathize with the client, but do not become attached or involved with the client on a personal basis. This is akin to the concern about biases coloring your ability to remain objective. Similarly, sympathy rather than empathy can make you less than objective.

Be Sociable, Share!

Tags: , , , ,

Leave a Reply