Posts Tagged ‘LSUC’

The Proper Tone of a Professional Communication

Wednesday, December 7th, 2011

Because paralegals are licensed in Ontario and can engage in limited practice of law without attorney supervision, they are subject to the “Paralegal Rules of Conduct” which can be enforced by the Law Society through the same process as is used to discipline lawyers. When the reports of discipline come out it seems there are far fewer for paralegal than attorneys, but I have no data to confirm that (and, of course, even if it is true there may be as many paralegal disciplinary proceedings portionate to the numbers practicing under each type of license, but those that do come through are generally fairly similar to those for lawyers. Here’s one that is a bit more interesting though:

KIMBERLY LYNN POLLOCK
From: City of Mississauga, Ontario
First hearing: November 21, 2011
LSUC Counsel: Jan Parnega-Welch
Paralegal not represented
Particulars of alleged professional misconduct from the Law Society’s Notice of Application filed June 7, 2011:
1. Contrary to Rule 2.01(2) of the Paralegal Rules of Conduct, you communicated with your former colleague, M.S., in a manner that was abusive, offensive or otherwise inconsistent with the proper tone of a professional communication from a paralegal, including three separate electronic communications on November 3, 2009.
2. Contrary to Rule 2.01(1) of the Paralegal Rules of Conduct, in your communication dated December 7, 2009, you attempted to mislead the Law Society when you unequivocally denied that you posted information about your former employer, C.R.S., on-line, when this representation was not true.

The result of the hearing:        Decision: The Paralegal was reprimanded.

More specifically the Law Society of Upper Canada website reports:

By Decision and Order dated November 21, 2011 the hearing panel ordered as follows:

The Paralegal is to be reprimanded.
The reprimand is to be administered to the Paralegal in person at the offices of the Law Society on December 19, 2011 at 1:00 p.m.
Costs of $1,000 to be paid by the Paralegal within one year of the Paralegal curing her administrative suspension.
Should the Paralegal fail to pay the costs within the one year period, the Panel orders that the Paralegal be suspended until such time as the costs are paid.
Should the Paralegal fail to attend to receive the reprimand on December 19, 2011 at 1:00 p.m., the Law Society shall be entitled to make further submissions as to penalty.

 Further information regarding the details of this matter do not appear to be available and is probably not real helpful anyway. However, I suspect that this rule, if applicable in the U.S., would get quite a workout!